WC pays dividends for game growth

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 30 November 2013 | 20.47

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player

THE World Cup is on track to be more profitable than the last one in 2008 and there are plans to expand the Four Nations in the hope of growing the game internationally.

Money alone doesn't guarantee development but it provides opportunities and the Rugby League International Federation have plans to try to take advantage.

They banked A$5.5 million in 2008, which was a considerable turnaround from the 2000 tournament which lost money, and RLIF chairman Scott Carter said they are on track to exceed profits this time around.

"We will exceed the 2008 surplus," Carter says. "I'm expecting conservatively at this stage between A$5 million and $6 million. It might go a bit higher because [the double header at] Wembley performed really well."

That first semi-final, won 20-18 by the Kiwis over England, was a terrific advert for the World Cup. It was exciting, dramatic, explosive and was played out in front of a 67,500-strong crowd.

The second semi-final, however, illustrated the shortcomings when Australia trounced Fiji 64-0.

As good as this World Cup has been overall, and it has been acknowledged as one of the best, the reality is only one of three teams was ever going to win. The gap between the Big Three of Australia, New Zealand and England and the rest is still enormous and doesn't look like closing any time soon.

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player

There's no doubt the tournament would benefit from more competitive fixtures at the top end but there was plenty to get excited about.

Scotland and the US surprised most by winning through to the quarter-finals and Italy also fielded a competitive outfit in their first World Cup. But it's difficult to forecast a time when an emerging nation can topple one of the Big Three.

"I hope so. I really do," Carter says. "I think we will see it in our lifetime."

What gives Carter some hope is the fact Italy beat England in a World Cup warm-up and the US also tipped over Wales.

"Yes, people can pull apart those victories because they were warm-up games but the reality is they happened. It wouldn't have been in the plans for England and Wales to lose those games."

The difficulty is, however, Italy don't know when they will play another international. Nor do the US and they are not alone.

They are fledgling rugby league nations with small infrastructures and many opted to play at the World Cup for free. They would benefit from more frequent internationals but it all costs money and also needs to fit into an already-congested calendar.

There are windows for international games and New Zealand's program is nearly locked in for the next World Cup cycle and is closely aligned to both Australia's and England's.

It's why the international federation are hoping to expand the Four Nations, which next year will feature Australia, New Zealand and England with the fourth likely to be either Fiji or Samoa.

Discussions are still at a very early stage but one idea has been to expand it to a six-team tournament with two groups of three.

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player

"The Four Nations is going to be rethought," Carter says. "We think it has worked on many fronts and is an improvement on the Tri Nations but it's not really developing the game.

"There have been various ideas and two pools of three is one of them, which would mean a slightly shorter tournament. It's a matter of balancing strategic development with commercial realties because everyone knows it takes money to make money. If you don't have the coin, someone else will have to pay the bill. But we are very focused on lifting the game, and we will."

One potential stumbling block to an expanded Four Nations is the fact it's a partnership owned by Australia, New Zealand and England, not the RLIF, which makes is more complex.

NZRL chief executive Phil Holden said they supported the concept of an expanded competition.

"It represents an opportunity to do more in that space," he says. "We recognise that to really push the game on internationally, we have got to be looking at how we do that and what teams are involved. I think there's a willingness to make it work because we know it's in everyone's best interests."

Some of the profits from this World Cup will be spent on human resources - a chief executive will be appointed to help run the RLIF - but most will be distributed to each of the 17 member nations in grants.

A significant proportion of the profits from the 2008 tournament was invested in France and Papua New Guinea in the hope of getting them back to the level where they were competitive with the Big Three.

The World Cup has had its critics. It has been labelled "a joke" and "waste of time" by some who think a competition involving any more than four teams is too many, but they were mostly made by people who didn't attend the tournament.

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash Player

The fact all the best players were in the UK would suggest they don't agree and the good crowds indicate there's an appetite for international league.

Seven of the 28 games sold out, including this morning's final at Old Trafford which was the biggest crowd ever for a rugby league test, and 383,995 spectators attended games overall. That's an average of 13,714 for each game.

Television audiences have also been strong. England's game against Fiji peaked at 2.4 million viewers on the BBC, which was more than four times the audience for England's rugby international against Argentina on the same afternoon, and England's semi-final against the Kiwis peaked at 2.83 million viewers in the UK.

"I simply don't subscribe to calls the tournament is a waste of time and tests between nations other than the top three aren't appealling because the stats prove otherwise," Carter says. "When you get Italy beating England and the US beating Wales in international games, how can you say it's not worth it? I think the tournament has been hugely positive."


Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

WC pays dividends for game growth

Dengan url

http://sportlivestyle.blogspot.com/2013/11/wc-pays-dividends-for-game-growth.html

Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

WC pays dividends for game growth

namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

WC pays dividends for game growth

sebagai sumbernya

0 komentar:

Posting Komentar

techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger